"too sensitive for the public to review" The Dept of Health forgets for whom they work-- for whom there job position exists.
But in major policy changes such as this, someone always profits; so follow the money. The DHS person whom made this decision did so for profit. But who would have paid the dept of health to make this information disappear? What organization would profit if this information were to disappear?
"too sensitive for the public to review" The Dept of Health forgets for whom they work-- for whom there job position exists.
But in major policy changes such as this, someone always profits; so follow the money. The DHS person whom made this decision did so for profit. But who would have paid the dept of health to make this information disappear? What organization would profit if this information were to disappear?