People think ATVs are cute and safer than motorcycles because of the big balloon tires, but those tires on rough terrain bounce like a basketball. Most wrecks are due to bad judgement, and one of the biggest mistakes in judgement is putting a child on an ATV that is under the age to have a drivers license. Don't blame the ATV manufacturer when you turn your child loose in the woods or on a rocky road, or worse still around other children and something catastrophic happens. ATVs are bigger and faster than a pro-football linebacker. When they hit a person or hit something with a person on them, there is bound to be significant injury. Lack of judgement or experience, as with a child, just makes matters worse.
I agree completely, children shouldn't be driving these things by themselves. They have little to no experience driving. I wouldn't let my daughter drive one till she had her drivers license and only with other adults in the group. My son is dying to drive but he is only fourteen and has to wait. I'm the parent and I make the rules.
I, for one, have never gotten the hang of riding a motorcycle yet can ride an ATV. This is probably most of the problem. ATVs are easier to use so more inexperienced people like me drive them. And I don't mean just children under a certain age. I'm 64 and would probably get worse injuries than someone of a comparable age with experience.
Tell that to my cousin, who is the next Terri Schiavo. Her mistake was getting on the back of a motorcycle when a man pulled out in front of them and cut them off. After 4 months of begging their mother to wake up, now her 2 kids get to watch her suffer for the rest of her life.
I agree. I'm 62 and have ridden an ATV for 40 years. The older I get, the slower I go. I have also worked as an ER doc in the past and seen a lot of accidents. The problems have been listed repeatedly in posts below: 1. Rookies, no matter what age, need instruction. 2. People think that a machine that can stand up on its own is safer - NOT SO! 3. I have seen a lot of children injured by ATVs because they were turned loose on one unsupervised. I have seen kids kill other kids. I remember two little girls brought in DOA when the go-cart they were riding in a low area on one side of a driveway was crushed by another young boy landed on top of them. He was jumping the driveway and did not see them. 4. Experienced bikers can tell you that it is the rookie in the group that makes the mistake that hurts or kills himself AND one or more of the experienced drivers.
We've owned ATV's for years and the problem with them is the rider not the vehicle. People just lose their common sense on ATVs and drive on unknown ground like maniacs. With any vehicle, respect is the key. Our grandson has been riding one since he was 5, now he's 17, and never had an accident. When he started he had to walk the ground first then ride, later he would ride slow to learn the terrain. Common Sense is the Key.
I agree, and I would add to "Common Sense is the Key",
"For those who are still learning common sense ( = all children under the age of 18 and all beginners), CLOSE ADULT SUPERVISION IS KEY."
And of course, those without common sense who just want to show off and perform "stunts, and those impaired in any way by alcohol or whatever, do not belong on an ATV at all.
Here's the problem, which the article stated: When in an accident, the person is more likely to die on an ATV than on a motorcycle. No where did the article say that human error was at fault.
But lets stop blaming the government for taking our freedoms, and look at a few points. Who is more likely to be in ANY type of vehicular accident? A minor. It doesn't matter if it's an ATV, a motorcycle, a car, truck, whatever. There's a reason insurance rates are higher for minors and young adults. And why is it the law that helmets are required? Because IF there is an accident, your chances of survival will go up, right? The people who decided on that law were not saying that EVERYONE who rides are a bunch of morons who are definitely going to get in an accident. But they are saying this will reduce the risk of a bad turn out IF. Likewise, putting a law into affect to keep children safe is reducing the risk of a similar IF. And if you read the article, the ban says the children in Mass. are banned from operating the machines. I don't know what the law says on the children riding the ATVs, provided their with someone older than 14, which they should have been riding with anyway, unless they're on a machine built for an 8 year old.
Kids have NO common sense. Neither do parents who allow kids to ride ATVs. The same reason applies to why we don't allow kids to drive automobiles, trucks, trains, or motorcycles until 16 (and then only with restrictions in many states).
You are right. I had an ATV accident 3 years ago. I fractured my pelvis. Luckily me and my guest were wearing helmets, because we hit hard. I wasn't supposed to have a rider with me on my King quad but did so anyway because we had company in town. It was a stupid idea. Also, I wanted to go through the training but never got a chance. Looking back I should have been trained by a professional because when we were losing control, I did the wrong thing and used both sets of brakes. My husband said I might have been able to save it from rolling if I braked properly.
Back in the early 80's I rode and raced Honda ATC's this means three (3) wheels not four. At the time I had the biggest engine made, 350X. In 1987 these machine's were baned from the US because of the "inherently" instability. I went to a state hearing on this issue and listened to parents who's children had been injured or even killed on these machine's. I heard testimony from one mother who stated that her son was killed after he broke into dad's liquor cabinet and took off, at night, with no helmet, into the back woods, on his dad's 2 stroke racing Kawasaki and hit a tree! Even though I felt for her loss and all the others at the hearing, I heard nothing to indicate the machine was at fault. Guns don't kill people! Anyway, I have ridden the new 4 wheel racing machine's and don't really care for them, they are a lot heavier and the extra wheel up front seams to reach out and grab anything in it's way. But government intervention is not the answer, there are laws restricting anyone under 16 to 90cc or smaller and it's not followed with any great consistency.
Myself and now my kids ride atv's all the time with no problems. Educating the child and supervising is key. This story is sad, however, the parents made a mistake in letting their child ride as a passenger with another child. Mistakes are made throughout life, hopefully we all learn from them. It's no different with other things in life. I let my kids shoot guns also. With many, many lessons and supervision, we do so while having a great time. Yes, quads, guns and many other things in life can be dangerous. Take the time to learn and to teach others so we don't need more restricting laws that infringe on responsible people.
I have been riding motorcycles off-road and on-road for well over 35 years. I have always held the opinion that ATV's were inherently more dangerous than motorcycles due to their instability and excessive weight. Additionally, since they have four wheels (thank God 3-wheelers were outlawed) anyone regardless of their experience or skill level can sit on one, whack the throttle and go. It is no wonder that ATV riders sustain more fatal injuries than motorcycle riders.
Thank God 3-wheelers were outlawed? I have ridden one for almost 14 years with no problems or accidents that could not be blamed on the operator. Stupidity of the rider has a lot to do with the accidents that happen to them. Honestly let people have their fun and what happens to them whether young or old is their own fault.
I rode on an ATV for the first time at Pismo Beach in CA (popular sand dunes for ATV riding and camping). I can tell you now, I had a quick lesson from my friend and I just followed her, our other friend (who's first time also) came along and got stuck because she didn't put enough power at certain points on the dunes. It was completely fun but I can see how one can misjudge the complexity of the ride.
Yes, they are complex when you have no clue. That is why proper training is needed for all to enjoy. And as you say "quick lesson" is not the way to go, especially with a child.
The article is about atv's actually being more dangerous than motorcycles. I used to ride offroad dirt bikes. I have had my bike land on me numerous times and I always walked away. I used to ride with an ex NBA player who rode atv's and bikes and had his atv flip on him and is now paralized because of that. He is about a foot taller and 100 pounds heavier than me. When you fall the atv's follow you while the bikes fall over. The atv's also have a lot more mass. I think that this is an important article in showing the misconception about the safety of the two vehicle types.
i would think there are more because where you ride a motorcycle, the roads are generally cleared around the road and shoulders. when riding atvs, your usually riding a clearing less then 6 feet wide and have lots of trees and stumps to hit. its not rockey science.
A large part of why off road bikes tend to be safer is that we typically wear much more protective gear than ATV riders (in my experience). The new law in MA is nonsense really. Here they go again legislating parental oversight. Where were the parents of the child who was unfortunately killed or the parents of the child who were having the party he was at. Blame them not the ATV! You see there are already laws on the size of an ATV a child can legally ride but they were probably unheeded as well in this case.
Bike helmet laws and seatbelt laws are also technically legislating parental oversight, but are unfortunately necessary because too many people out there are carelessly endangering their children, who are too young to fully comprehend the ramifications of their decisions (to not wear a seatbelt, or to not wear a helmet). In my opinion, letting children (8 years old??) operate ATVs is reckless. They just don't have the same judgment and decision making capacity that adults do. Why do you think we don't let children child-sized cars down the highway?? Furthermore, I doubt anyone thinks it's a great idea to let a child operate a motorcycle... and according to this study, at least, ATVs are more deadly than motorcycles. Until adults start taking responsibility for children who are too young to be responsible for themselves, unfortunately no-brainer laws like this are necessary (at least, in my opinion).
Maybe I got lucky, but I grew up on a 3-wheeler and loved it. Got hurt on my bicycle just as much. My dad didn't let me take off on that 3-wheeler as soon as we got it! And I don't let my kids take off on their quads as soon as I bought them. We took our time to learn and not go straight out to a monster hill or creek. We started out slow. I agree that a 5 or 8 or 10 year old doesn't comprehend as well. That is why you teach them and take it slow. BTW, I know many adults who don't comprehend very well. That said, they can legally have a quad and hurt themselves. Regulation won't help them.
Very true. That's why we see 35 year olds causing car crashing while driving drunk and texting at the same time! Some "adults", and pretty much all children/teens, think that accidents aren't going to happen to them even if they are careless, which is why sometimes it's a good idea to keep dangerous things away from kids- not necessarily because it's impossible to do something like that safely with supervision, but that some parents just don't realize (or care) that the kids should be supervised. I agree that with anything risky, kids should be taught carefully and slowly and have appropriate supervision. I think the problem is that some parents just don't realize that it's risky (strangely). Maybe laws like this will at least alert people to the fact that it's a risky activity, and if they still let their kids ride, they do it with more caution because of the new awareness.
But by banning them, no one gets to use them. Therefore, that restricts the responsible person. If it's for the good of mankind, then we should ban a lot of things, ie.. cars and phones due to texting while driving or cars and alcohol/prescription drugs due to driving under the influence. I could go on all day, but I won't. I don't mind better rules or laws for people who don't follow the rules, but don't ban the atv's as kids or adults will find another way to hurt themselves and we who try to do right can't enjoy an atv.
Yes, but when something happens to someone when they're driving drunk and they cause a car crash, because of the laws, there are legal things that can happen to help the drunk driver, the person or people they hit, (if they're still alive), etc.
With no laws regarding the ATVs, all those people who don't use their intelligence before riding will have legal responsibility to do the right thing, sellers of machines may think twice before marketing improper machines towards younger children, adults will be held legally responsible (as they should be), rental places will have more responsibility.
You've got to be kidding me. I've ridden dirtbikes since I was three years old. People are getting so pathetic as time goes on. I can't imagine what will be outlawed in 5, 10, 15, years. Sickening. No wonder why we've got a bunch of overweight kids, all we'll let them do is play video games. Like I said; pathetic.
I grew up on dirtbikes. I got my first one when I was 12.
Eleanor, dirtbikes and quads are a very physical thing to do. There is no power steering, and with a dirtbike you are leaning to turn. It takes a lot of physical effort.
This law is just another step down the slippery slope of our eroding freedoms. On private land, the government should have no say what I ride or let my kids ride. Common sense and a slow introduction to the machines, with appropriately sized vehicles is the way to go, and the way I will be going when I have kids.
Eleanor, riding an atv or dirtbike can be very much of a workout. Some people ride just for the workout. Some just put along. It's like saying going to the pool for heavy people to just float around on their back is not very physical. True, but if you actually swim it is a great workout. The first time I went snowboarding I felt like I had been beat with a board. You work muscles you never new you had. Same can be said with atv's and bikes.
I stand corrected- I didn't know that ATVs were such a good workout. However, I still think that just because it's on private land doesn't mean it shouldn't be regulated (for example, if your child drives a car on private land, that is still illegal- even if, chances are, no one will see it or call the police about it). Also, just to be the devil's advocate, it's also still illegal to kill people on private property... it being private property usually doesn't have much to do with how laws and regulations work. I still stand by my opinion that while it may be very possible to carefully supervise a child to ride an ATV, just as it is probably very possible to carefully supervise a child driving a car, it doesn't mean there shouldn't be a law against it, because the majority of lay people don't know what it means to "properly supervise" a child in control of a heavy, fast piece of machinery. (And I do know that there are child's ATVs available, that go about 5-10mph, but my question about those is, why not have those kids ride a bicycle, that won't kill them when it flips on top of them? It would go the same speed.)
That's not really true. Children well under the legal driving age have been driving farm trucks and vehicles for decades on the farm and I don't think it is illegal. I think the damage that a 3/4 ton or 1 ton vehicle can do far exceeds that of an ATV. Also, some farms and ranches use ATVs with the young ones operating them as well, albeit for work purposes rather than recreation.
I am glad you guys are finally catching up, because any experienced motorcycle rider already knows that ATVs are much more dangerous then motorcycles, for many reasons...
I have ridden and raced motorcycles off and on road since i was 7. I also raced quads (TRX250R) both on a local level and GNCC TT and woods circuit. My brother-in-law raced 3-wheelers (ATC250R) on the same circuits. I have always had worse injuries on 2 wheels over 4, it mostly has to do with rider education and experience level. Yes the ATV's generally have more mass, but the are not as quick or as fast as their motorcycle cousins.
Common Sense... this often eludes kids under 16. You could argue that all accidents on the road are the drivers fault. Its legislation and engineering systems that are required.
Plus, there is absolutely no safety engineering with these vehicles, such as identifying rollover speeds or accelerations.
Do they identify the rollover speed for a new dodge ram? Yes, kids don't always think the way adults do and that is why a responsible adult should be around when atv's are in use for people who are learning to ride.
As with all mechanical devices, the addition of a user is what makes the difference. The device, at rest, is harmless. This is applicable to everything from guns to atvs to cars to moon rovers. Use it properly and with common sense and rarely have a problem. Act like an idiot and, well, so it goes.
Actually, I see alot of young kids on ATVs where we go riding. I have even seen adults with babies riding. The ATV accidents I have seen usually end up withe machine on top of the person. These machines are very heavy. A friend had his flip on top of him after hitting a stump sticking out on a trail. If there hadn't been other riders who pulled the machine off him, he would have suffocated because he couldn't breathe with the weight on him.
Agree with bmx mom -- I see a lot more kids on ATVs than adults. I personally know two families who lost sub-teen children due to ATV accidents -- one of the kids was riding with his dad (on a separate ATV) when he was killed in a flipover. His dad is an orthopedic surgeon.
I just wish parents would stop a moment before handing the kiddies the keys to the ATV and think about the odds. The longer they ride, the greater the odds they'll get into a nasty accident.
Beatle Baby - what is your point? That ATVs are too dangerous, or that proper training, maturity and experience should be considered before handing over the keys?
motorcycle will always require more skill to use, more skill generally means less injury. given the same speed and crash, the motorcycle rider will have more experiance in crashing small and also has much less of a vehicle to land on them
We can thank the CSPC for killing kids! What you might say? Thats right! The CSPC has been requiring manufacturersand dealers for several years know that you can only ride a 90cc machine under 16. What has happened is there are 50cc and 90cc machines for children and when you turn 16 you can ride what ever size you want, usually a 450cc or 500cc ATV. What has happen is ther is no development for anything in between. Therefore you have to buy a 300cc ATV for a child so you can trail ride with your family. We are a family of 6, 4 children between 11 and 17. We have ridden Montana, Utah, Idaho, NH, Maine and Tennesee. In the last 6 years we have probally 20,000 combined miles and not one injury. On two occasions we have ridden over 100 miles in one day. We have to teach safety, safety safety. I have taken my children to the hospital for broken bones and stitches, but not from ATV riding. ATV riding is a great family sport and as a parent I should be able to keep my rights as a parent to decide what we do as a family.
I've seen both motorcycle and ATV accidents where serious injuries occured, and also where the riders just go up and walked away. I love to ride ATV's, and I do let our 5yr old daughter ride hers as well. She started at 12 months with a small Dora battery operated ATV, and has progressed. I am sure it is more risky than walking and such, but we train and supervise our kids as they ride.
A lot of the problem is the weight of the vehicle. Having been in wrecks on multiple occassions, you really need to be aware of what you riding on, and how to properly bail out if something goes wrong. I tend to ride extreme trails/hills, and I always analyze the possibilities before making the attempt. I don't agree with this new law at all, but it does make sense that it is in Mass. They have little in the way of areas for riding, so it is no big loss to the community. If you think that waiting til your kid is 14, giving him a 250cc Raptor and sending him on his way is safe, you could not be more wrong. The kids will still need extensive training especially since those machines tend to be capable of 40-60mph, while the kids ATV's are doing 5-10mph.
But would you agree that regardless, a child/person would need training for these vehicles? Which not everyone is capable of doing. For instance, my sister and her husband have never ridden ATVs. If their daughter decided she wanted to go riding, they obviously would not be good choices to take her for her first time, as they never have, and would not be able to give her any training on usage or safety. So wouldn't it be a good idea for a certified organization to be around to be able to teach people how to ride these safely? Give people some sort of certification that says they have passed some sort of training course and they are knowledgeable in the usage of the machine? Before my sister or her husband put their daughter in danger? And then, god-forbid, the worst were to happen. There was an accident. The machine somehow rolled over on their daughter. But, they took the certification class, so they at least were knowledgeable, so when legal action starts, or child welfare services shows up or something else happens (because lets face it, someone, somewhere in this world might sue if she's not dead, and if she is, someone might sue just because), but they're legally okay because they went through the legal certification course for the machine, and knew what they were doing, and this time it was just one of those freak accidents that hey, still happen.
But without any kind of training course, my sister and her husband decide to take their daughter out. None of them have had any training, but hey, it's got 4 wheels, and (like a good portion of people) it's gotta be easy, right? And opps, the worst happens (like before) and someone shows up (like before) and their daughter is hurt or dead, and they get sued or worse, and now their daughter has been taken from them either by the courts for putting her in harms way, or she's dead, or they're in jail, or someone else has sued for custody...Legally, there is no protection for them at all.
This law isn't for people like you who obviously know what they're doing, this law is for the dummies who don't.
Here we go again! The "Lawmakers" have to step in and protect us from ourselves... Hey, do you really want to save lives? Ban swimming pools and cars too!!!
its all in the training! train them the right way to ride and how to do it correctly and watch the results. my son has been riding since he was 4 and has never had a crash. he has been riding now for 10 years. its the same thing with the yamaha rhino people get on them and drive like idiots or with someone who does and look what happens!!! atv's dont kill people people kill people!!!!!!!!!!!!
OccDoctor is right on -- same initial reaction as mine. The bike riders tend to be younger, in better physical condition, and possibly more experienced than ATV riders overall. I also wonder if the study considered underage ATV riders who shouldn't have been riding in the first place. By the way, I'm 63 and I have an ATV, but I'm careful too!
There is a learning curve which takes time to master a bike, with a ATV you get on go. They saw the same issue with stand up Jet-Skis and then came the PWC's and the rate of injuries went thru the roof.
This is my theory as well, as a long-time ATV rider. When you get on a motorcycle or dirtbike, at the typically slow learning and novice speeds, they FEEL dangerous. Motorcycles are inherently unstable at slow speeds.
However, an ATV is stable at slow speeds. It FEELS safe, so I think people are much more likely to push their speeds beyond their skill levels. They feel safe because they can turn and control their quad at higher speeds, but they don't have the experience to recognize dangerous situations, or the skills to react to an emergency. Because ATVs are so much more stable at slow speeds, people typically don't take the time to develop the skills necessary to ride them at higher speeds.
I'm going to speculate in a different direction. As a motorcycle rider, albeit a street biker, I am going to guess that motorcycle riders have greater skill and experience then ATV riders. I'm further going to guess that when a motorcycle rider crashes, he may still have some control of the bike before the actual crash and it may ameliorate the injuries to some degree. On the other hand, when an ATV goes out of control, it's really out of control with the rider on it. When a bike goes out of control, the rider is usually thrown off the bike. Just my take on it.
another example of how 4 wheelers are harder to ride than 2 wheelers is my son's z50 dirtbike. i bought it for him when he was 5 and his legs were too short ot touch the ground so i installed training wheels (a bar attached to the frame in the center of the bike). i also tied a rope to it so that i could run around govorning his speed whle he learned. he's now very proficient at riding it without my "spotting him", but it's a reall hazard for adults who ride it. people who have ridden motorbikes before get on his 4 wheeled motorcycle and crash it almost every time. that can't control it near as well as when they can lean the bike while cornering. this is a clear example to me that 2 wheels is easier to control than 4.
People think ATVs are cute and safer than motorcycles because of the big balloon tires, but those tires on rough terrain bounce like a basketball. Most wrecks are due to bad judgement, and one of the biggest mistakes in judgement is putting a child on an ATV that is under the age to have a drivers license. Don't blame the ATV manufacturer when you turn your child loose in the woods or on a rocky road, or worse still around other children and something catastrophic happens. ATVs are bigger and faster than a pro-football linebacker. When they hit a person or hit something with a person on them, there is bound to be significant injury. Lack of judgement or experience, as with a child, just makes matters worse.
I agree completely, children shouldn't be driving these things by themselves. They have little to no experience driving. I wouldn't let my daughter drive one till she had her drivers license and only with other adults in the group. My son is dying to drive but he is only fourteen and has to wait. I'm the parent and I make the rules.
I, for one, have never gotten the hang of riding a motorcycle yet can ride an ATV. This is probably most of the problem. ATVs are easier to use so more inexperienced people like me drive them. And I don't mean just children under a certain age. I'm 64 and would probably get worse injuries than someone of a comparable age with experience.
Tell that to my cousin, who is the next Terri Schiavo. Her mistake was getting on the back of a motorcycle when a man pulled out in front of them and cut them off. After 4 months of begging their mother to wake up, now her 2 kids get to watch her suffer for the rest of her life.
This is news? This is not something they just figured out.
I used to ride ATV's for a living and have had some pretty bad spills. Even at slow speed, it bangs you up pretty bad.
BBoomer
I agree. I'm 62 and have ridden an ATV for 40 years. The older I get, the slower I go. I have also worked as an ER doc in the past and seen a lot of accidents. The problems have been listed repeatedly in posts below: 1. Rookies, no matter what age, need instruction. 2. People think that a machine that can stand up on its own is safer - NOT SO! 3. I have seen a lot of children injured by ATVs because they were turned loose on one unsupervised. I have seen kids kill other kids. I remember two little girls brought in DOA when the go-cart they were riding in a low area on one side of a driveway was crushed by another young boy landed on top of them. He was jumping the driveway and did not see them. 4. Experienced bikers can tell you that it is the rookie in the group that makes the mistake that hurts or kills himself AND one or more of the experienced drivers.
The ATV is safer myth is like the SUV is safer myth. People are ignorant of basic physics and safety.
We've owned ATV's for years and the problem with them is the rider not the vehicle. People just lose their common sense on ATVs and drive on unknown ground like maniacs. With any vehicle, respect is the key. Our grandson has been riding one since he was 5, now he's 17, and never had an accident. When he started he had to walk the ground first then ride, later he would ride slow to learn the terrain. Common Sense is the Key.
In complete agreement shawn.
Well said Shawn, I've been riding ATV's for 7 years and racing them for 5, and the problem is not the ATV, it's who's driving the ATV.
SHAWN -
I agree, and I would add to "Common Sense is the Key",
"For those who are still learning common sense ( = all children under the age of 18 and all beginners), CLOSE ADULT SUPERVISION IS KEY."
And of course, those without common sense who just want to show off and perform "stunts, and those impaired in any way by alcohol or whatever, do not belong on an ATV at all.
Common sense and experience. Common sense says "you need experience." Experience says "use common sense."
Here's the problem, which the article stated: When in an accident, the person is more likely to die on an ATV than on a motorcycle. No where did the article say that human error was at fault.
But lets stop blaming the government for taking our freedoms, and look at a few points. Who is more likely to be in ANY type of vehicular accident? A minor. It doesn't matter if it's an ATV, a motorcycle, a car, truck, whatever. There's a reason insurance rates are higher for minors and young adults. And why is it the law that helmets are required? Because IF there is an accident, your chances of survival will go up, right? The people who decided on that law were not saying that EVERYONE who rides are a bunch of morons who are definitely going to get in an accident. But they are saying this will reduce the risk of a bad turn out IF. Likewise, putting a law into affect to keep children safe is reducing the risk of a similar IF. And if you read the article, the ban says the children in Mass. are banned from operating the machines. I don't know what the law says on the children riding the ATVs, provided their with someone older than 14, which they should have been riding with anyway, unless they're on a machine built for an 8 year old.
Kids have NO common sense. Neither do parents who allow kids to ride ATVs. The same reason applies to why we don't allow kids to drive automobiles, trucks, trains, or motorcycles until 16 (and then only with restrictions in many states).
You are right. I had an ATV accident 3 years ago. I fractured my pelvis. Luckily me and my guest were wearing helmets, because we hit hard. I wasn't supposed to have a rider with me on my King quad but did so anyway because we had company in town. It was a stupid idea. Also, I wanted to go through the training but never got a chance. Looking back I should have been trained by a professional because when we were losing control, I did the wrong thing and used both sets of brakes. My husband said I might have been able to save it from rolling if I braked properly.
Back in the early 80's I rode and raced Honda ATC's this means three (3) wheels not four. At the time I had the biggest engine made, 350X. In 1987 these machine's were baned from the US because of the "inherently" instability. I went to a state hearing on this issue and listened to parents who's children had been injured or even killed on these machine's. I heard testimony from one mother who stated that her son was killed after he broke into dad's liquor cabinet and took off, at night, with no helmet, into the back woods, on his dad's 2 stroke racing Kawasaki and hit a tree! Even though I felt for her loss and all the others at the hearing, I heard nothing to indicate the machine was at fault. Guns don't kill people! Anyway, I have ridden the new 4 wheel racing machine's and don't really care for them, they are a lot heavier and the extra wheel up front seams to reach out and grab anything in it's way. But government intervention is not the answer, there are laws restricting anyone under 16 to 90cc or smaller and it's not followed with any great consistency.
Myself and now my kids ride atv's all the time with no problems. Educating the child and supervising is key. This story is sad, however, the parents made a mistake in letting their child ride as a passenger with another child. Mistakes are made throughout life, hopefully we all learn from them. It's no different with other things in life. I let my kids shoot guns also. With many, many lessons and supervision, we do so while having a great time. Yes, quads, guns and many other things in life can be dangerous. Take the time to learn and to teach others so we don't need more restricting laws that infringe on responsible people.
Exactly! Typical knee-jerk massachusetts.
I have been riding motorcycles off-road and on-road for well over 35 years. I have always held the opinion that ATV's were inherently more dangerous than motorcycles due to their instability and excessive weight. Additionally, since they have four wheels (thank God 3-wheelers were outlawed) anyone regardless of their experience or skill level can sit on one, whack the throttle and go. It is no wonder that ATV riders sustain more fatal injuries than motorcycle riders.
Thank God 3-wheelers were outlawed? I have ridden one for almost 14 years with no problems or accidents that could not be blamed on the operator. Stupidity of the rider has a lot to do with the accidents that happen to them. Honestly let people have their fun and what happens to them whether young or old is their own fault.
I rode on an ATV for the first time at Pismo Beach in CA (popular sand dunes for ATV riding and camping). I can tell you now, I had a quick lesson from my friend and I just followed her, our other friend (who's first time also) came along and got stuck because she didn't put enough power at certain points on the dunes. It was completely fun but I can see how one can misjudge the complexity of the ride.
Yes, they are complex when you have no clue. That is why proper training is needed for all to enjoy. And as you say "quick lesson" is not the way to go, especially with a child.
The article is about atv's actually being more dangerous than motorcycles. I used to ride offroad dirt bikes. I have had my bike land on me numerous times and I always walked away. I used to ride with an ex NBA player who rode atv's and bikes and had his atv flip on him and is now paralized because of that. He is about a foot taller and 100 pounds heavier than me. When you fall the atv's follow you while the bikes fall over. The atv's also have a lot more mass. I think that this is an important article in showing the misconception about the safety of the two vehicle types.
They definitely have more mass, 300-500 lbs. That is why a child should not be on one without proper supervision and safety gear.
i would think there are more because where you ride a motorcycle, the roads are generally cleared around the road and shoulders. when riding atvs, your usually riding a clearing less then 6 feet wide and have lots of trees and stumps to hit. its not rockey science.
A large part of why off road bikes tend to be safer is that we typically wear much more protective gear than ATV riders (in my experience). The new law in MA is nonsense really. Here they go again legislating parental oversight. Where were the parents of the child who was unfortunately killed or the parents of the child who were having the party he was at. Blame them not the ATV! You see there are already laws on the size of an ATV a child can legally ride but they were probably unheeded as well in this case.
Bike helmet laws and seatbelt laws are also technically legislating parental oversight, but are unfortunately necessary because too many people out there are carelessly endangering their children, who are too young to fully comprehend the ramifications of their decisions (to not wear a seatbelt, or to not wear a helmet). In my opinion, letting children (8 years old??) operate ATVs is reckless. They just don't have the same judgment and decision making capacity that adults do. Why do you think we don't let children child-sized cars down the highway?? Furthermore, I doubt anyone thinks it's a great idea to let a child operate a motorcycle... and according to this study, at least, ATVs are more deadly than motorcycles. Until adults start taking responsibility for children who are too young to be responsible for themselves, unfortunately no-brainer laws like this are necessary (at least, in my opinion).
Maybe I got lucky, but I grew up on a 3-wheeler and loved it. Got hurt on my bicycle just as much. My dad didn't let me take off on that 3-wheeler as soon as we got it! And I don't let my kids take off on their quads as soon as I bought them. We took our time to learn and not go straight out to a monster hill or creek. We started out slow. I agree that a 5 or 8 or 10 year old doesn't comprehend as well. That is why you teach them and take it slow. BTW, I know many adults who don't comprehend very well. That said, they can legally have a quad and hurt themselves. Regulation won't help them.
Very true. That's why we see 35 year olds causing car crashing while driving drunk and texting at the same time! Some "adults", and pretty much all children/teens, think that accidents aren't going to happen to them even if they are careless, which is why sometimes it's a good idea to keep dangerous things away from kids- not necessarily because it's impossible to do something like that safely with supervision, but that some parents just don't realize (or care) that the kids should be supervised. I agree that with anything risky, kids should be taught carefully and slowly and have appropriate supervision. I think the problem is that some parents just don't realize that it's risky (strangely). Maybe laws like this will at least alert people to the fact that it's a risky activity, and if they still let their kids ride, they do it with more caution because of the new awareness.
But by banning them, no one gets to use them. Therefore, that restricts the responsible person. If it's for the good of mankind, then we should ban a lot of things, ie.. cars and phones due to texting while driving or cars and alcohol/prescription drugs due to driving under the influence. I could go on all day, but I won't. I don't mind better rules or laws for people who don't follow the rules, but don't ban the atv's as kids or adults will find another way to hurt themselves and we who try to do right can't enjoy an atv.
Yes, but when something happens to someone when they're driving drunk and they cause a car crash, because of the laws, there are legal things that can happen to help the drunk driver, the person or people they hit, (if they're still alive), etc.
With no laws regarding the ATVs, all those people who don't use their intelligence before riding will have legal responsibility to do the right thing, sellers of machines may think twice before marketing improper machines towards younger children, adults will be held legally responsible (as they should be), rental places will have more responsibility.
You've got to be kidding me. I've ridden dirtbikes since I was three years old. People are getting so pathetic as time goes on. I can't imagine what will be outlawed in 5, 10, 15, years. Sickening. No wonder why we've got a bunch of overweight kids, all we'll let them do is play video games. Like I said; pathetic.
a) sittting on an ATV isn't going to help overweight kids lose weight... tell them to run around and play instead.
b) I doubt anyone thinks a 3 year old on a dirtbike is a good idea.
I grew up on dirtbikes. I got my first one when I was 12.
Eleanor, dirtbikes and quads are a very physical thing to do. There is no power steering, and with a dirtbike you are leaning to turn. It takes a lot of physical effort.
This law is just another step down the slippery slope of our eroding freedoms. On private land, the government should have no say what I ride or let my kids ride. Common sense and a slow introduction to the machines, with appropriately sized vehicles is the way to go, and the way I will be going when I have kids.
Eleanor, riding an atv or dirtbike can be very much of a workout. Some people ride just for the workout. Some just put along. It's like saying going to the pool for heavy people to just float around on their back is not very physical. True, but if you actually swim it is a great workout. The first time I went snowboarding I felt like I had been beat with a board. You work muscles you never new you had. Same can be said with atv's and bikes.
I stand corrected- I didn't know that ATVs were such a good workout. However, I still think that just because it's on private land doesn't mean it shouldn't be regulated (for example, if your child drives a car on private land, that is still illegal- even if, chances are, no one will see it or call the police about it). Also, just to be the devil's advocate, it's also still illegal to kill people on private property... it being private property usually doesn't have much to do with how laws and regulations work. I still stand by my opinion that while it may be very possible to carefully supervise a child to ride an ATV, just as it is probably very possible to carefully supervise a child driving a car, it doesn't mean there shouldn't be a law against it, because the majority of lay people don't know what it means to "properly supervise" a child in control of a heavy, fast piece of machinery. (And I do know that there are child's ATVs available, that go about 5-10mph, but my question about those is, why not have those kids ride a bicycle, that won't kill them when it flips on top of them? It would go the same speed.)
That's not really true. Children well under the legal driving age have been driving farm trucks and vehicles for decades on the farm and I don't think it is illegal. I think the damage that a 3/4 ton or 1 ton vehicle can do far exceeds that of an ATV. Also, some farms and ranches use ATVs with the young ones operating them as well, albeit for work purposes rather than recreation.
I am glad you guys are finally catching up, because any experienced motorcycle rider already knows that ATVs are much more dangerous then motorcycles, for many reasons...
BULLCRAP
I have ridden and raced motorcycles off and on road since i was 7. I also raced quads (TRX250R) both on a local level and GNCC TT and woods circuit. My brother-in-law raced 3-wheelers (ATC250R) on the same circuits. I have always had worse injuries on 2 wheels over 4, it mostly has to do with rider education and experience level. Yes the ATV's generally have more mass, but the are not as quick or as fast as their motorcycle cousins.
Common Sense... this often eludes kids under 16. You could argue that all accidents on the road are the drivers fault. Its legislation and engineering systems that are required.
Plus, there is absolutely no safety engineering with these vehicles, such as identifying rollover speeds or accelerations.
Do they identify the rollover speed for a new dodge ram? Yes, kids don't always think the way adults do and that is why a responsible adult should be around when atv's are in use for people who are learning to ride.
As with all mechanical devices, the addition of a user is what makes the difference. The device, at rest, is harmless. This is applicable to everything from guns to atvs to cars to moon rovers. Use it properly and with common sense and rarely have a problem. Act like an idiot and, well, so it goes.
Are the death rates age adjusted? ATV riders tend to be older while dirt bike riders are young skinny males who withstand a crash much better.
Actually, I see alot of young kids on ATVs where we go riding. I have even seen adults with babies riding. The ATV accidents I have seen usually end up withe machine on top of the person. These machines are very heavy. A friend had his flip on top of him after hitting a stump sticking out on a trail. If there hadn't been other riders who pulled the machine off him, he would have suffocated because he couldn't breathe with the weight on him.
Agree with bmx mom -- I see a lot more kids on ATVs than adults. I personally know two families who lost sub-teen children due to ATV accidents -- one of the kids was riding with his dad (on a separate ATV) when he was killed in a flipover. His dad is an orthopedic surgeon.
I just wish parents would stop a moment before handing the kiddies the keys to the ATV and think about the odds. The longer they ride, the greater the odds they'll get into a nasty accident.
That can be said about a bicycle, golf cart, car or any other motorized vehicle.
Beatle Baby - what is your point? That ATVs are too dangerous, or that proper training, maturity and experience should be considered before handing over the keys?
motorcycle will always require more skill to use, more skill generally means less injury. given the same speed and crash, the motorcycle rider will have more experiance in crashing small and also has much less of a vehicle to land on them
We can thank the CSPC for killing kids! What you might say? Thats right! The CSPC has been requiring manufacturersand dealers for several years know that you can only ride a 90cc machine under 16. What has happened is there are 50cc and 90cc machines for children and when you turn 16 you can ride what ever size you want, usually a 450cc or 500cc ATV. What has happen is ther is no development for anything in between. Therefore you have to buy a 300cc ATV for a child so you can trail ride with your family. We are a family of 6, 4 children between 11 and 17. We have ridden Montana, Utah, Idaho, NH, Maine and Tennesee. In the last 6 years we have probally 20,000 combined miles and not one injury. On two occasions we have ridden over 100 miles in one day. We have to teach safety, safety safety. I have taken my children to the hospital for broken bones and stitches, but not from ATV riding. ATV riding is a great family sport and as a parent I should be able to keep my rights as a parent to decide what we do as a family.
I've seen both motorcycle and ATV accidents where serious injuries occured, and also where the riders just go up and walked away. I love to ride ATV's, and I do let our 5yr old daughter ride hers as well. She started at 12 months with a small Dora battery operated ATV, and has progressed. I am sure it is more risky than walking and such, but we train and supervise our kids as they ride.
A lot of the problem is the weight of the vehicle. Having been in wrecks on multiple occassions, you really need to be aware of what you riding on, and how to properly bail out if something goes wrong. I tend to ride extreme trails/hills, and I always analyze the possibilities before making the attempt. I don't agree with this new law at all, but it does make sense that it is in Mass. They have little in the way of areas for riding, so it is no big loss to the community. If you think that waiting til your kid is 14, giving him a 250cc Raptor and sending him on his way is safe, you could not be more wrong. The kids will still need extensive training especially since those machines tend to be capable of 40-60mph, while the kids ATV's are doing 5-10mph.
But would you agree that regardless, a child/person would need training for these vehicles? Which not everyone is capable of doing. For instance, my sister and her husband have never ridden ATVs. If their daughter decided she wanted to go riding, they obviously would not be good choices to take her for her first time, as they never have, and would not be able to give her any training on usage or safety. So wouldn't it be a good idea for a certified organization to be around to be able to teach people how to ride these safely? Give people some sort of certification that says they have passed some sort of training course and they are knowledgeable in the usage of the machine? Before my sister or her husband put their daughter in danger? And then, god-forbid, the worst were to happen. There was an accident. The machine somehow rolled over on their daughter. But, they took the certification class, so they at least were knowledgeable, so when legal action starts, or child welfare services shows up or something else happens (because lets face it, someone, somewhere in this world might sue if she's not dead, and if she is, someone might sue just because), but they're legally okay because they went through the legal certification course for the machine, and knew what they were doing, and this time it was just one of those freak accidents that hey, still happen.
But without any kind of training course, my sister and her husband decide to take their daughter out. None of them have had any training, but hey, it's got 4 wheels, and (like a good portion of people) it's gotta be easy, right? And opps, the worst happens (like before) and someone shows up (like before) and their daughter is hurt or dead, and they get sued or worse, and now their daughter has been taken from them either by the courts for putting her in harms way, or she's dead, or they're in jail, or someone else has sued for custody...Legally, there is no protection for them at all.
This law isn't for people like you who obviously know what they're doing, this law is for the dummies who don't.
Hah! And to think I grew up riding a three wheeler without any injuries, but like most here have said it's the rider who is dangerous.
Here we go again! The "Lawmakers" have to step in and protect us from ourselves... Hey, do you really want to save lives? Ban swimming pools and cars too!!!
That says it all!!!!!
its all in the training! train them the right way to ride and how to do it correctly and watch the results. my son has been riding since he was 4 and has never had a crash. he has been riding now for 10 years. its the same thing with the yamaha rhino people get on them and drive like idiots or with someone who does and look what happens!!! atv's dont kill people people kill people!!!!!!!!!!!!
OccDoctor is right on -- same initial reaction as mine. The bike riders tend to be younger, in better physical condition, and possibly more experienced than ATV riders overall. I also wonder if the study considered underage ATV riders who shouldn't have been riding in the first place. By the way, I'm 63 and I have an ATV, but I'm careful too!
There is a learning curve which takes time to master a bike, with a ATV you get on go. They saw the same issue with stand up Jet-Skis and then came the PWC's and the rate of injuries went thru the roof.
Wear the saftey gear!
This is my theory as well, as a long-time ATV rider. When you get on a motorcycle or dirtbike, at the typically slow learning and novice speeds, they FEEL dangerous. Motorcycles are inherently unstable at slow speeds.
However, an ATV is stable at slow speeds. It FEELS safe, so I think people are much more likely to push their speeds beyond their skill levels. They feel safe because they can turn and control their quad at higher speeds, but they don't have the experience to recognize dangerous situations, or the skills to react to an emergency. Because ATVs are so much more stable at slow speeds, people typically don't take the time to develop the skills necessary to ride them at higher speeds.
I'm going to speculate in a different direction. As a motorcycle rider, albeit a street biker, I am going to guess that motorcycle riders have greater skill and experience then ATV riders. I'm further going to guess that when a motorcycle rider crashes, he may still have some control of the bike before the actual crash and it may ameliorate the injuries to some degree. On the other hand, when an ATV goes out of control, it's really out of control with the rider on it. When a bike goes out of control, the rider is usually thrown off the bike. Just my take on it.
another example of how 4 wheelers are harder to ride than 2 wheelers is my son's z50 dirtbike. i bought it for him when he was 5 and his legs were too short ot touch the ground so i installed training wheels (a bar attached to the frame in the center of the bike). i also tied a rope to it so that i could run around govorning his speed whle he learned. he's now very proficient at riding it without my "spotting him", but it's a reall hazard for adults who ride it. people who have ridden motorbikes before get on his 4 wheeled motorcycle and crash it almost every time. that can't control it near as well as when they can lean the bike while cornering. this is a clear example to me that 2 wheels is easier to control than 4.
Far more kids are killed by abortions than on motorized vehicles every year, why not go after big hitters first?