The answer to the drug problem is to end the spectacularly failed costly Drug War. When is the U.S. government going to finally realize that it can't legislate morality? Many people believe the answer to solving our drug problem is to simply tell people to say "no" to drugs but after being in practice for decades now the evidence shows this has failed miserably. People have been doing drugs for thousands of years and it's never going to stop. There will always be people who do drugs and those who become addicted. Didn't we learn from the mistakes of Alcohol Prohibition in the 1920s/30s? It didn't work then, and drug prohibition certainly isn't working now. The failed Drug War has cost the U.S. taxpayers over a trillion dollars and has been in force for over seven decades. And the real tragedy here is all of the violence that has been associated with the Drug War and illegal drug trafficking. Drugs are more readily available and the Drug War has created a black market, gangs in every U.S. state, and powerful violent cartels south of the border and in other countries. The laws have done more damage to this country than the drugs themselves. We have created more criminals out of drug users/addicts who should really be treated as medical patients. Wouldn't we be better off spending the Drug War funding on education, drug treatment and rehabilitation instead of failed law enforcement and incarceration? And not having to build more prisons? We need to reevaluate our position on drug use in this country. I firmly believe we should decriminalize all drugs. Legalize marijuana and regulate it like alcohol in regards to the law, and create an atmosphere that doesn't stigmatize the drug user. I would never advocate anyone use dangerous hard drugs like meth, cocaine, heroin, etc. But the fact of life remains people will choose to use such drugs and become addicted. Countries in Europe have tried different strategies that have reduced the problems associated with drug use. Why can't the U.S. take these same approaches? We should adopt programs for hard drugs (meth, coke, heroin,etc.) like the Swiss heroin program (where addicts can get their drugs from medically supervised clinics) which has shown positive results in reducing violent crime, HIV infections and helps drug addicts to become stable and productive members of society. Locking people up and throwing away the key is not the answer. When someone has a real drug problem and is addicted their main focus will always be to obtain and use drugs, regardless of any law. And putting a mark on someone's permanent record that will follow them for the rest of their lives will only hinder them to become productive members in society in getting jobs, student financial aid, etc. There are many people against legalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs and have expressed many fears and dooms day scenarios but evidence has revealed this would simply NOT be the result. Portugal decriminalized drugs in 2001 and none of the nightmare scenarios touted by preenactment decriminalization opponents have become a reality. And what are the ramifications of manufacturing, importing, and selling the drugs right here in the U.S? Wouldn't that create a new industry? Jobs? Tax revenue? And stop funding the violent cartels and eventually take away their power? These are questions that I think once answered, will solve our drug problems and the days of the Drug War will be history.
How do we prevent children from being exposed to their Parrents pot smoking. Does anyone see the absurdity of a first grader going to school with a contact high or for that matter is the bus driver high?
It is a dangerous false assumption to think that Use of a substance like Pot can be regulated. Whats the score card on alcohol and tobaco?
What makes you think parents don't smoke around their kids now? And why would there be a double standard? If parents can drink a beer now around their kids why not pot? For someone to get a contact buzz you would have to inhale a large amount of second hand smoke for a good amount of time. I seriously doubt most parents wouldn't smoke in front of their kids anyway. And your scenario where a kid goes to school with a contact buzz is just absurd because that would mean the parents were smoking heavily for hours before the kid left the house. I'm positive that most parents wouldn't be smoking at that time of day and would be more worried about preparing their kids for school and getting themselves ready for their day for work, etc.
As for the bus driver, I would never condone anyone who has the safety of others in their hands to never be under the influence of anything. But you seem to think that once marijuana is legalized that bus drivers are going to go out and get stoned before performing their duties. Well, I got news for you. If a bus driver is driving with a buzz, they will be doing that regardless of whether or not weed is legal. And I'm sure some do it now with weed being illegal.
Alcohol and tobacco have been regulated for quite some time now so I'm not sure what you mean by their score card? If anything those two drugs have killed many people where marijuana has not caused a single death. So to keep weed illegal based on that notion is completely absurd.
Do you have any more absurd fear mongering scenarios you can come up with your over active imagination?
The answer to the drug problem is to end the spectacularly failed costly Drug War. When is the U.S. government going to finally realize that it can't legislate morality? Many people believe the answer to solving our drug problem is to simply tell people to say "no" to drugs but after being in practice for decades now the evidence shows this has failed miserably. People have been doing drugs for thousands of years and it's never going to stop. There will always be people who do drugs and those who become addicted. Didn't we learn from the mistakes of Alcohol Prohibition in the 1920s/30s? It didn't work then, and drug prohibition certainly isn't working now. The failed Drug War has cost the U.S. taxpayers over a trillion dollars and has been in force for over seven decades. And the real tragedy here is all of the violence that has been associated with the Drug War and illegal drug trafficking. Drugs are more readily available and the Drug War has created a black market, gangs in every U.S. state, and powerful violent cartels south of the border and in other countries. The laws have done more damage to this country than the drugs themselves. We have created more criminals out of drug users/addicts who should really be treated as medical patients. Wouldn't we be better off spending the Drug War funding on education, drug treatment and rehabilitation instead of failed law enforcement and incarceration? And not having to build more prisons? We need to reevaluate our position on drug use in this country. I firmly believe we should decriminalize all drugs. Legalize marijuana and regulate it like alcohol in regards to the law, and create an atmosphere that doesn't stigmatize the drug user. I would never advocate anyone use dangerous hard drugs like meth, cocaine, heroin, etc. But the fact of life remains people will choose to use such drugs and become addicted. Countries in Europe have tried different strategies that have reduced the problems associated with drug use. Why can't the U.S. take these same approaches? We should adopt programs for hard drugs (meth, coke, heroin,etc.) like the Swiss heroin program (where addicts can get their drugs from medically supervised clinics) which has shown positive results in reducing violent crime, HIV infections and helps drug addicts to become stable and productive members of society. Locking people up and throwing away the key is not the answer. When someone has a real drug problem and is addicted their main focus will always be to obtain and use drugs, regardless of any law. And putting a mark on someone's permanent record that will follow them for the rest of their lives will only hinder them to become productive members in society in getting jobs, student financial aid, etc. There are many people against legalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs and have expressed many fears and dooms day scenarios but evidence has revealed this would simply NOT be the result. Portugal decriminalized drugs in 2001 and none of the nightmare scenarios touted by preenactment decriminalization opponents have become a reality. And what are the ramifications of manufacturing, importing, and selling the drugs right here in the U.S? Wouldn't that create a new industry? Jobs? Tax revenue? And stop funding the violent cartels and eventually take away their power? These are questions that I think once answered, will solve our drug problems and the days of the Drug War will be history.
How do we prevent children from being exposed to their Parrents pot smoking. Does anyone see the absurdity of a first grader going to school with a contact high or for that matter is the bus driver high?
It is a dangerous false assumption to think that Use of a substance like Pot can be regulated. Whats the score card on alcohol and tobaco?
What makes you think parents don't smoke around their kids now? And why would there be a double standard? If parents can drink a beer now around their kids why not pot? For someone to get a contact buzz you would have to inhale a large amount of second hand smoke for a good amount of time. I seriously doubt most parents wouldn't smoke in front of their kids anyway. And your scenario where a kid goes to school with a contact buzz is just absurd because that would mean the parents were smoking heavily for hours before the kid left the house. I'm positive that most parents wouldn't be smoking at that time of day and would be more worried about preparing their kids for school and getting themselves ready for their day for work, etc.
As for the bus driver, I would never condone anyone who has the safety of others in their hands to never be under the influence of anything. But you seem to think that once marijuana is legalized that bus drivers are going to go out and get stoned before performing their duties. Well, I got news for you. If a bus driver is driving with a buzz, they will be doing that regardless of whether or not weed is legal. And I'm sure some do it now with weed being illegal.
Alcohol and tobacco have been regulated for quite some time now so I'm not sure what you mean by their score card? If anything those two drugs have killed many people where marijuana has not caused a single death. So to keep weed illegal based on that notion is completely absurd.
Do you have any more absurd fear mongering scenarios you can come up with your over active imagination?