Well, we won't know what will have happened to these kids when they reach age 40, but in the meantime we will study the matter further. And continue to reap huge profits.

Well, of course paid research is going to say that. "Alles fur profits!!" is the motto of the folks that hired them.

But nowadays I say let everyone who wants one have one - it'll "reduce the surplus population" as Ebeneezer Scrooge said. Me, I'm staying away from microwaves as much as I can - hardwired network in the house, I spend as little time as possible in wi-fi areas, and have never had a cellphone, and never will.

I could die tomorrow in a car wreck, but brain cancer is not my idea of fun.

So they admit basically that the conclusions are based on incomplete data, but there is no risk. Yet they find a 2x increase in risk in a subset and dismiss it because the data is incomplete.

I guess if your paying for the 'science' you can have it both ways!

My 'guess' would be that kids are at less of a risk because they text more then talk.

Yet. This study is too early to determine if cell phone use is a cancer risk. If a youth starts smoking now and quit is the risk any different from a smoker who starts as an adult and keeps on smoking. Cancer is a risk for everyone, young or old. There is no real scientific proof what causes cancer, we can only go by what habits, diet, activity, where we live and family history to determine what really causes cancer.