The foreskin is richly innervated erogenous tissue and should not be amputated without medical urgency or unless the benefit SIGNIFICANTLY outweighs the potential for harm. Virtually all medical associations in the world agree there is no benefit to non-therapeutic circumcision. Bronze age religious blood rituals should never trump rational scientific judgment, contemporary medical ethics and the universal right to bodily integrity. Put down the scalpels, the boy is the patient, not the parents. His body, his choice.
What a welcome to the world for boys!!! Get spanked by the Doc and then they do surgery on your thang. Enough to make you want to crawl back into the womb!
With all the problems in the world, they are worried about this practice which is commanded by two world religions? This is sheer hate speech, not medicine.
actually, it DOES prevent some transmission of STDs, even AIDS, so it saves lives. Where is the potential for harm? Ashkenazi Jews take the highest percent of Nobel prizes and Pulitzer prizes in the world, amazing since there are so few of them. So obviously circumscision didn't hurt THEM. Doctors should be more worried about the things that actually kill, like prescription medication errors, or drugs like Prozac that cause you to kill people or yourself even when used as directed. And parents should make these decisions, not doctors. When Dutch people start winning prestigious prizes in the same frequency as Jews, I will start listening to them.
Um, Askenaski sex is just as good as anyone else's. In fact the religion totally honors sex and encourages it, within marriage of course. To a Jew there is no such thing as "just sex" and there is nothing you are not allowed to do if you are married. A Jewish woman actually has an official right to sex (the number of times depends on her husband's job.) If he doesn't perform, she is entitled to a divorce. If he even changes jobs so she gets less, she can divorce. And this rule has been in place for 2000 years.
Yep. I can tell by your comment that women are probably stumbling all over themselves to get ahold of your uncircumcised penis. Because its so important to show those imaginary women who the boss is as you swing it around like that. Hope you enjoy youself...alone.
I have recently read several studies that male circumcision greatly reduces the occurance of STD's in the women circumsized men have sex with. Guess this is another thing about "who cares about women's health? There are plenty of women in the world and who cares if we infect some of them and kill them?". And having oral sex with someone who is not circumcized is sickening. Of course, to most of the men here, having never tried it, that would be a non-issue. Most women feel that the circumcised penis is a beautiful thing. Uncircumsized, it's pretty gross looking, smelling and well...you get the picture. Also, it is very difficult, almost impossible to keep an uncircumcised baby clean. I think that men who are uncircumcised are trying to level the playing field on this one. Because women just think they are gross and having oral sex with them is totally sickening. Just trying to be honest here guys. I know most of you don't care what women think.
Your right, I have absolutely NO respect for women that mutilate babies. You don't care about men's health or you would have all that flapping skin cut off like you are promoting.
Mothers don't have to clean an uncircumcised baby's penis. The foreskin is attached just like the nail to the nail bed for about 3 years. You know how bad it hurts to rip your fingernail off? That's the first thing they do during a circumcision. They rip the skin and fermium loose from the glans with blunt forceps. Then they pull the bleeding skin forward and crush it with another pair. Then they slice the skin off. Then they push the cut back over the head and leave the wound bare. Hopefully not cutting the glans off in the process. All the while the baby is screaming or in shock. About 100 babies in the United States DIE each year from complication from circumcision. 2 baby boys die each year DURING the circumcision and that's what doctors will tell you if you press them hard enough, it's just two out of a million. Did you know that? That's not counting amputated penises, glans. Deformed urethra, skin bridges, horrific scaring and 100's of other complication.
Are you telling me that you would put your baby through that just to so some woman can suck his dick in 18 or 20 years?
have a Jewish mohel do it. They give the baby a bit of wine so he doesn't feel it. Oh, right, now you are going to get all horrified about underage drinking. Maybe they should use some other drug. But they do have such drugs. No kid should have to die--just do it correctly. This is a total non issue.
wine would only lessen the pain. The baby would still feel it, and what about after the procedure? Its an exposed, raw wound. People make the surgery sound like its no big deal, but it has to be excrutiatingly painful after, and we're doing this to newborns. It just seems so wrong and unfair.
whats wrong and unfair is that we don't give adequate pain medication. I'm sure you're aware that you can actually be put under for surgery although this is risky for a neonate. Maybe they should wait until he is a bit older. But for the rest of the child's life, he will be cleaner, healthier, and much more attractive to women. You know it isn't all that painful later because the child doesn't cry later.
And what about spreading disease and infection to women? You are just another woman hater. One who doesn't care how many women die of preventable disease caused by men who carry infection just so their foreskin is intact. If they outlaw it, people will still have their babies circumcised. Even the doctors know they will. For the health of women and for religious reaons and there isn't a thing you can do about it. Men who are not circumcised are disgusting. Every woman feels that way, even if they don't say so. Maybe you don't care what women think. Maybe you don't care about anything but being accepted as one of the unclean. Maybe you don't like women at all. Seems so. Been rejected much or are you on the other side of the fence? It makes me wonder why you are all for keeping foreskins intact. I have grandsons, nephews, foster sons and many young male friends who wouldn't dream of not circumcising their sons and of all the little boy babies I have known in my long life, not one has had a bad experience with his circumcision. I think it's all bull so that the ones who haven't been will be more accepted as sex partners and not rejected as being filthy. Know you don't care and I don't care what you think either. Because I know who will be more desired and accepted in their future. As do all of the fathers of all of the boy babies I have ever known.
I am a woman, and and so were my sons two doctors who advised me that there is NO MEDICAL NEED for circumcision. Prior to my sons birth, I had been planning on having him circumcised, and was just debating the method (ritual or regular surgery). I was researching and watched a video on youtube of a typical procedure, and it left me sobbing and determined that I would NEVER do that to my child! Its not like there's this loose flap of extra skin that they just trim off. Like someone stated above, its attached like a nail to a nailbed. They have to literally RIP the skin from the head of the penis. To me thats torture, and as a parent, its my job to protect my child. As for the uncleanliness and stds, that does not come hand in hand with being uncircumsized, thats due to poor hygiene, which is a personal choice. Someone who knows how to properly clean themselves should have no issues. I actually come from a family of males that are not circumcised, not one of which have EVER had an issue or any stds. My brother was even in the marines and was at times unable to properly bathe for weeks- never a problem! I'd like to add it was actually way easier to clean my son diapers than my daughters- she had all the cracks and crevices, whereas it was extremely easy to clean any poop off of his penis. I think I would agree that a circumsized penis looks more attractive, but I am not willing to promote cosmetic surgery on infants due to that. I figured if a girl would be unwilling to be with my son due to being uncircumcised, he's better off not being with someone that would be that shallow and judgemental to begin with. I would rather he make the choice for himself when he's older. I had an ex boyfriend that was uncircumcised, and it was never an issue as far as cleanliness. I'm not trying to make you wrong or fight with you, I just would like you to be open minded and re-examine your arguments for circumcising helpless infants. Watch a video of the procedure and see if you feel the same way. If stds are passed more easily fron those who are uncircumcised, then obviously boys need to be taught safer sex practices and better hygiene practices, I don't believe the answer is chop off their extra skin. I dont believe the std thing is even that much of a problem, because there are so many in the medical field who do not promote circumsicion, and I feel like if that was a big concern, they would address that. The american pediatric association states there is no MEDICAL need for it! Just please research this a little better before you promote this cruel, barbaric procedure. Do you really believe a child is not in excruciating pain from being circumsicised? There are so many that dont, but I just dont find it logical to say there is little to no pain after the initial procedure. How could a raw, exposed surgical wound not be extremely painful? How do you justify that procedure so your sons penis is more socially acceptable? More and more parents are chooing to not circumcise (even the Jewish community is seeing a decline due to the barbarity of circumcision), so its actually going to be more normal to still be intact. I hope this will help steer someone from making a very unfair choice for their infant. Like I said earlier, leave your kids penis alone and let them choose for themselves when they are old enough to do so. From experience with my ex and my husband, I can also tell you an intact penis has way more nerve endings and feeling, and I believe wnen you cut the skin off where all of that stuff is located, you are deprivng that male from the pleasure thy would have recieved from that. No woman hating here, its about human rights and educating yourself and loving your child enough to do whats best for them, not more socially acceptable.
I am a woman, and and so were my sons two doctors who advised me that there is NO MEDICAL NEED for circumcision. Prior to my sons birth, I had been planning on having him circumcised, and was just debating the method (ritual or regular surgery). I was researching and watched a video on youtube of a typical procedure, and it left me sobbing and determined that I would NEVER do that to my child! Its not like there's this loose flap of extra skin that they just trim off. Like someone stated above, its attached like a nail to a nailbed. They have to literally RIP the skin from the head of the penis. To me thats torture, and as a parent, its my job to protect my child. As for the uncleanliness and stds, that does not come hand in hand with being uncircumsized, thats due to poor hygiene, which is a personal choice. Someone who knows how to properly clean themselves should have no issues. I actually come from a family of males that are not circumcised, not one of which have EVER had an issue or any stds. My brother was even in the marines and was at times unable to properly bathe for weeks- never a problem! I'd like to add it was actually way easier to clean my son diapers than my daughters- she had all the cracks and crevices, whereas it was extremely easy to clean any poop off of his penis. I think I would agree that a circumsized penis looks more attractive, but I am not willing to promote cosmetic surgery on infants due to that. I figured if a girl would be unwilling to be with my son due to being uncircumcised, he's better off not being with someone that would be that shallow and judgemental to begin with. I would rather he make the choice for himself when he's older. I had an ex boyfriend that was uncircumcised, and it was never an issue as far as cleanliness. I'm not trying to make you wrong or fight with you, I just would like you to be open minded and re-examine your arguments for circumcising helpless infants. Watch a video of the procedure and see if you feel the same way. If stds are passed more easily fron those who are uncircumcised, then obviously boys need to be taught safer sex practices and better hygiene practices, I don't believe the answer is chop off their extra skin. I dont believe the std thing is even that much of a problem, because there are so many in the medical field who do not promote circumsicion, and I feel like if that was a big concern, they would address that. The american pediatric association states there is no MEDICAL need for it! Just please research this a little better before you promote this cruel, barbaric procedure. Do you really believe a child is not in excruciating pain from being circumsicised? There are so many that dont, but I just dont find it logical to say there is little to no pain after the initial procedure. How could a raw, exposed surgical wound not be extremely painful? How do you justify that procedure so your sons penis is more socially acceptable? More and more parents are chooing to not circumcise (even the Jewish community is seeing a decline due to the barbarity of circumcision), so its actually going to be more normal to still be intact. I hope this will help steer someone from making a very unfair choice for their infant. Like I said earlier, leave your kids penis alone and let them choose for themselves when they are old enough to do so. From experience with my ex and my husband, I can also tell you an intact penis has way more nerve endings and feeling, and I believe wnen you cut the skin off where all of that stuff is located, you are deprivng that male from the pleasure thy would have recieved from that. No woman hating here, its about human rights and educating yourself and loving your child enough to do whats best for them, not more socially acceptable
Actually irenavr, it's worth reading twice. I don't hate women. I just have no respect for a women that wants to mutilate a man just for her selfishness.
Congratulations to all the mothers who have the forsight not to circumcise. If you're that stupid you think circumcision is valid because of a cleaness issue than your son is probably as stupid as you.
Here's one environmental scientist / biologist that disagrees. The human appendix functions as a toxin filter; it's just not necessary for life because other organs play a greater role. There are no mistakes in a species. A mistake in a individual member can be good, bad, or neutral. If it's an advantage the members keep it (all male mammals have a functioning foreskin so I guess its pretty damn important). You might want to study natural selection and phases of extinction. You don't have to cut it off which is a disadvantage. God don't make mistakes, people do.
okay, I get your point, but evolution takes time, involves random mutations, and therefore isn't perfect. How could it be? Your appendix can kill you. You can easily live without it. When people run off to remote places to do field studies, they sometimes have their healthy appendix removed first.
The foreskin is richly innervated erogenous tissue and should not be amputated without medical urgency or unless the benefit SIGNIFICANTLY outweighs the potential for harm. Virtually all medical associations in the world agree there is no benefit to non-therapeutic circumcision. Bronze age religious blood rituals should never trump rational scientific judgment, contemporary medical ethics and the universal right to bodily integrity. Put down the scalpels, the boy is the patient, not the parents. His body, his choice.
What a welcome to the world for boys!!! Get spanked by the Doc and then they do surgery on your thang. Enough to make you want to crawl back into the womb!
With all the problems in the world, they are worried about this practice which is commanded by two world religions? This is sheer hate speech, not medicine.
actually, it DOES prevent some transmission of STDs, even AIDS, so it saves lives. Where is the potential for harm? Ashkenazi Jews take the highest percent of Nobel prizes and Pulitzer prizes in the world, amazing since there are so few of them. So obviously circumscision didn't hurt THEM. Doctors should be more worried about the things that actually kill, like prescription medication errors, or drugs like Prozac that cause you to kill people or yourself even when used as directed. And parents should make these decisions, not doctors. When Dutch people start winning prestigious prizes in the same frequency as Jews, I will start listening to them.
Since sex is so dull for them; what else do they have to do.
Great post, Oom Yaaqub.
Um, Askenaski sex is just as good as anyone else's. In fact the religion totally honors sex and encourages it, within marriage of course. To a Jew there is no such thing as "just sex" and there is nothing you are not allowed to do if you are married. A Jewish woman actually has an official right to sex (the number of times depends on her husband's job.) If he doesn't perform, she is entitled to a divorce. If he even changes jobs so she gets less, she can divorce. And this rule has been in place for 2000 years.
On a personal note: No circumcision - No blow job. A lot of women feel the same way I do, so consider that when you choose not to circumcise.
@ loripuff :
If you're gonna cut off a piece of your penis just to please chicks you might wanna remove your balls too cause you won't be needing them
@loripuff : If you're gonna cut off a piece of your penis just to please chicks you might wanna remove your balls too cause you won't be needing them
Yep. I can tell by your comment that women are probably stumbling all over themselves to get ahold of your uncircumcised penis. Because its so important to show those imaginary women who the boss is as you swing it around like that. Hope you enjoy youself...alone.
Great post, leahshell! Some men are so arrogant!
I have recently read several studies that male circumcision greatly reduces the occurance of STD's in the women circumsized men have sex with. Guess this is another thing about "who cares about women's health? There are plenty of women in the world and who cares if we infect some of them and kill them?". And having oral sex with someone who is not circumcized is sickening. Of course, to most of the men here, having never tried it, that would be a non-issue. Most women feel that the circumcised penis is a beautiful thing. Uncircumsized, it's pretty gross looking, smelling and well...you get the picture. Also, it is very difficult, almost impossible to keep an uncircumcised baby clean. I think that men who are uncircumcised are trying to level the playing field on this one. Because women just think they are gross and having oral sex with them is totally sickening. Just trying to be honest here guys. I know most of you don't care what women think.
Your right, I have absolutely NO respect for women that mutilate babies. You don't care about men's health or you would have all that flapping skin cut off like you are promoting.
Mothers don't have to clean an uncircumcised baby's penis. The foreskin is attached just like the nail to the nail bed for about 3 years. You know how bad it hurts to rip your fingernail off? That's the first thing they do during a circumcision. They rip the skin and fermium loose from the glans with blunt forceps. Then they pull the bleeding skin forward and crush it with another pair. Then they slice the skin off. Then they push the cut back over the head and leave the wound bare. Hopefully not cutting the glans off in the process. All the while the baby is screaming or in shock. About 100 babies in the United States DIE each year from complication from circumcision. 2 baby boys die each year DURING the circumcision and that's what doctors will tell you if you press them hard enough, it's just two out of a million. Did you know that? That's not counting amputated penises, glans. Deformed urethra, skin bridges, horrific scaring and 100's of other complication.
Are you telling me that you would put your baby through that just to so some woman can suck his dick in 18 or 20 years?
have a Jewish mohel do it. They give the baby a bit of wine so he doesn't feel it. Oh, right, now you are going to get all horrified about underage drinking. Maybe they should use some other drug. But they do have such drugs. No kid should have to die--just do it correctly. This is a total non issue.
wine would only lessen the pain. The baby would still feel it, and what about after the procedure? Its an exposed, raw wound. People make the surgery sound like its no big deal, but it has to be excrutiatingly painful after, and we're doing this to newborns. It just seems so wrong and unfair.
whats wrong and unfair is that we don't give adequate pain medication. I'm sure you're aware that you can actually be put under for surgery although this is risky for a neonate. Maybe they should wait until he is a bit older. But for the rest of the child's life, he will be cleaner, healthier, and much more attractive to women. You know it isn't all that painful later because the child doesn't cry later.
And what about spreading disease and infection to women? You are just another woman hater. One who doesn't care how many women die of preventable disease caused by men who carry infection just so their foreskin is intact. If they outlaw it, people will still have their babies circumcised. Even the doctors know they will. For the health of women and for religious reaons and there isn't a thing you can do about it. Men who are not circumcised are disgusting. Every woman feels that way, even if they don't say so. Maybe you don't care what women think. Maybe you don't care about anything but being accepted as one of the unclean. Maybe you don't like women at all. Seems so. Been rejected much or are you on the other side of the fence? It makes me wonder why you are all for keeping foreskins intact. I have grandsons, nephews, foster sons and many young male friends who wouldn't dream of not circumcising their sons and of all the little boy babies I have known in my long life, not one has had a bad experience with his circumcision. I think it's all bull so that the ones who haven't been will be more accepted as sex partners and not rejected as being filthy. Know you don't care and I don't care what you think either. Because I know who will be more desired and accepted in their future. As do all of the fathers of all of the boy babies I have ever known.
So when are you going to be circumcised to protect men?
I am a woman, and and so were my sons two doctors who advised me that there is NO MEDICAL NEED for circumcision. Prior to my sons birth, I had been planning on having him circumcised, and was just debating the method (ritual or regular surgery). I was researching and watched a video on youtube of a typical procedure, and it left me sobbing and determined that I would NEVER do that to my child! Its not like there's this loose flap of extra skin that they just trim off. Like someone stated above, its attached like a nail to a nailbed. They have to literally RIP the skin from the head of the penis. To me thats torture, and as a parent, its my job to protect my child. As for the uncleanliness and stds, that does not come hand in hand with being uncircumsized, thats due to poor hygiene, which is a personal choice. Someone who knows how to properly clean themselves should have no issues. I actually come from a family of males that are not circumcised, not one of which have EVER had an issue or any stds. My brother was even in the marines and was at times unable to properly bathe for weeks- never a problem! I'd like to add it was actually way easier to clean my son diapers than my daughters- she had all the cracks and crevices, whereas it was extremely easy to clean any poop off of his penis. I think I would agree that a circumsized penis looks more attractive, but I am not willing to promote cosmetic surgery on infants due to that. I figured if a girl would be unwilling to be with my son due to being uncircumcised, he's better off not being with someone that would be that shallow and judgemental to begin with. I would rather he make the choice for himself when he's older. I had an ex boyfriend that was uncircumcised, and it was never an issue as far as cleanliness. I'm not trying to make you wrong or fight with you, I just would like you to be open minded and re-examine your arguments for circumcising helpless infants. Watch a video of the procedure and see if you feel the same way. If stds are passed more easily fron those who are uncircumcised, then obviously boys need to be taught safer sex practices and better hygiene practices, I don't believe the answer is chop off their extra skin. I dont believe the std thing is even that much of a problem, because there are so many in the medical field who do not promote circumsicion, and I feel like if that was a big concern, they would address that. The american pediatric association states there is no MEDICAL need for it! Just please research this a little better before you promote this cruel, barbaric procedure. Do you really believe a child is not in excruciating pain from being circumsicised? There are so many that dont, but I just dont find it logical to say there is little to no pain after the initial procedure. How could a raw, exposed surgical wound not be extremely painful? How do you justify that procedure so your sons penis is more socially acceptable? More and more parents are chooing to not circumcise (even the Jewish community is seeing a decline due to the barbarity of circumcision), so its actually going to be more normal to still be intact. I hope this will help steer someone from making a very unfair choice for their infant. Like I said earlier, leave your kids penis alone and let them choose for themselves when they are old enough to do so. From experience with my ex and my husband, I can also tell you an intact penis has way more nerve endings and feeling, and I believe wnen you cut the skin off where all of that stuff is located, you are deprivng that male from the pleasure thy would have recieved from that. No woman hating here, its about human rights and educating yourself and loving your child enough to do whats best for them, not more socially acceptable.
I am a woman, and and so were my sons two doctors who advised me that there is NO MEDICAL NEED for circumcision. Prior to my sons birth, I had been planning on having him circumcised, and was just debating the method (ritual or regular surgery). I was researching and watched a video on youtube of a typical procedure, and it left me sobbing and determined that I would NEVER do that to my child! Its not like there's this loose flap of extra skin that they just trim off. Like someone stated above, its attached like a nail to a nailbed. They have to literally RIP the skin from the head of the penis. To me thats torture, and as a parent, its my job to protect my child. As for the uncleanliness and stds, that does not come hand in hand with being uncircumsized, thats due to poor hygiene, which is a personal choice. Someone who knows how to properly clean themselves should have no issues. I actually come from a family of males that are not circumcised, not one of which have EVER had an issue or any stds. My brother was even in the marines and was at times unable to properly bathe for weeks- never a problem! I'd like to add it was actually way easier to clean my son diapers than my daughters- she had all the cracks and crevices, whereas it was extremely easy to clean any poop off of his penis. I think I would agree that a circumsized penis looks more attractive, but I am not willing to promote cosmetic surgery on infants due to that. I figured if a girl would be unwilling to be with my son due to being uncircumcised, he's better off not being with someone that would be that shallow and judgemental to begin with. I would rather he make the choice for himself when he's older. I had an ex boyfriend that was uncircumcised, and it was never an issue as far as cleanliness. I'm not trying to make you wrong or fight with you, I just would like you to be open minded and re-examine your arguments for circumcising helpless infants. Watch a video of the procedure and see if you feel the same way. If stds are passed more easily fron those who are uncircumcised, then obviously boys need to be taught safer sex practices and better hygiene practices, I don't believe the answer is chop off their extra skin. I dont believe the std thing is even that much of a problem, because there are so many in the medical field who do not promote circumsicion, and I feel like if that was a big concern, they would address that. The american pediatric association states there is no MEDICAL need for it! Just please research this a little better before you promote this cruel, barbaric procedure. Do you really believe a child is not in excruciating pain from being circumsicised? There are so many that dont, but I just dont find it logical to say there is little to no pain after the initial procedure. How could a raw, exposed surgical wound not be extremely painful? How do you justify that procedure so your sons penis is more socially acceptable? More and more parents are chooing to not circumcise (even the Jewish community is seeing a decline due to the barbarity of circumcision), so its actually going to be more normal to still be intact. I hope this will help steer someone from making a very unfair choice for their infant. Like I said earlier, leave your kids penis alone and let them choose for themselves when they are old enough to do so. From experience with my ex and my husband, I can also tell you an intact penis has way more nerve endings and feeling, and I believe wnen you cut the skin off where all of that stuff is located, you are deprivng that male from the pleasure thy would have recieved from that. No woman hating here, its about human rights and educating yourself and loving your child enough to do whats best for them, not more socially acceptable
OOPS!! Posted twice- sorry, I couldnt figure out how to delete this comment!
Actually irenavr, it's worth reading twice. I don't hate women. I just have no respect for a women that wants to mutilate a man just for her selfishness.
Congratulations to all the mothers who have the forsight not to circumcise. If you're that stupid you think circumcision is valid because of a cleaness issue than your son is probably as stupid as you.
Look, any biologist can explain there are mistakes in evolution, like the human appendix. The foreskin is another one.
Here's one environmental scientist / biologist that disagrees. The human appendix functions as a toxin filter; it's just not necessary for life because other organs play a greater role. There are no mistakes in a species. A mistake in a individual member can be good, bad, or neutral. If it's an advantage the members keep it (all male mammals have a functioning foreskin so I guess its pretty damn important). You might want to study natural selection and phases of extinction. You don't have to cut it off which is a disadvantage. God don't make mistakes, people do.
okay, I get your point, but evolution takes time, involves random mutations, and therefore isn't perfect. How could it be? Your appendix can kill you. You can easily live without it. When people run off to remote places to do field studies, they sometimes have their healthy appendix removed first.
And IMHO even God makes occasional mistakes, otherwise he wouldn't be able to forgive ours.