Article Source: msnbc.comfrom:msnbc.comCDC: Many teen moms didn't think it could happenSeeded on Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:30 PM EST (msnbc.com) Permalink6 comments— Filed under: health
Ruken What were they thinking, exactly, isn't clear. Spoiler alert: they weren't. #1 - Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:41 PM ESTEugene SaxeSex education is wrong. Contraception is wrong. Little girls giving birth to littler girls is right. Having the public pay to raise said littler girls is a much better investment than free condoms.#2 - Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:32 PM ESTDavid WalkerParents not talking to their children? Nope, couldn't be that. Forbidding sex education in schools? Nope, couldn't be that. Teaching abstinence only? No, couldn't be that. Nope. There's just no explanation for this. #3 - Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:46 PM ESTLarry Dickman-3592372Obsess much about religion Eugene..................?#4 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:41 AM ESTRukenEugene has to be making sarcastic remarks in that post.#4.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:47 AM ESTEugene SaxeSarcasm? What's that? And no, religion rarely crosses my mind, except when folks find a way to jam it into replies to articles here that have squat to do with religion.#4.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:36 PM ESTLeave a Comment:Name: Email Address (will be verified, but never shown): You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) Post to my Facebook Wall Newsvine Privacy StatementAs a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Spoiler alert: they weren't.
Sex education is wrong. Contraception is wrong.
Little girls giving birth to littler girls is right. Having the public pay to raise said littler girls is a much better investment than free condoms.
Parents not talking to their children? Nope, couldn't be that. Forbidding sex education in schools? Nope, couldn't be that. Teaching abstinence only? No, couldn't be that.
Nope. There's just no explanation for this.
Obsess much about religion Eugene..................?
Eugene has to be making sarcastic remarks in that post.
Sarcasm? What's that?
And no, religion rarely crosses my mind, except when folks find a way to jam it into replies to articles here that have squat to do with religion.